When provided with 50+ W of CPU package power, the AMD Radeon 680M iGPU is more or less twice as fast as the previous AMD Vega 8 chip found in the 2021 Ryzen Cezanne hardware.įinally, none of these integrated iGPUs are a proper match for even an entry-level Max-Q dGPU such as the RTX 3050Ti in the XPS 15. With that in mind, let’s go over some benchmark results first: Graphicsīased on these alone, the 680M seems to be a significant update of the 2021 Vega 8 iGPU, while the 660M is clearly a more budget implementation with less than half of its processing power. I’ve listed the specs sheets for both RDNA2 chips down below, next to the previous-gen Vega 8 chip.

We’ll also follow up on the Radeon 660M bundled with the R圜PUs in a separate article at a later date, once we get to properly test that as well. I’ll also mention that there are two AMD Radeon 600M RNDA2-based iGPUs with the current AMD generation, and this article goes over the top-tier Radeon 680M option, bundled with the Ryzen 7 and Ryprocessors. I also recommend going through detailed reviews for a more in-depth analysis of what each unit can do.

That’s why I’ve run some tests at a few different power settings, in order to better understand how the 680M is going to perform in an ultraportable and power-limited implementation. Implementations without the same thermal design, especially the ultra-portable Ryzen U/H ultraportable formats that will be available this year, might not be able to perform the same way, due to various power/thermal limitations. It’s important to understand that the G14 hardware implementation provides more than sufficient power and cooling capacity for a Ryzen-only configuration, and is indicative of the maximum performance you can expect from the Radeon 680M iGPU. Our results are based on the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS processor in the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14, where we disabled the dGPU to be able to test the iGPU in all sorts of loads.

Ati radeon d33a27 benchmark